Archive for June, 2012 | Monthly archive page

This week’s Jewish Tribune

Tuesday, June 26th, 2012



Forward to a friend | Unsubscribe


Having trouble viewing this email?
Click here to view the hosted version.

June 21, 2012


Israel’s Watergate


Atara Beck

Israel CorrespondentJERUSALEM – Not only is the claim that Israel steals water from the Palestinians a flagrant lie, but the exact opposite is true – Palestinians are stealing water from Israel, and Israel provides the Palestinians with plenty of water, says American attorney Mark Langfan, whose findings were recently confirmed by a detailed Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) fact sheet regarding the water issues in the West Bank, published by the Civil Administration of Judea and Samaria.


Trudeau tikkun olam tweet earns Conservative rebuke


Joanne Hill
CorrespondentTORONTO – Cabinet Minister Jason Kenney’s press secretary has lashed out at Papineau MP Justin Trudeau’s accusation that Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government does not believe in tikkun olam.

Trudeau tweeted on June 15: “The real problem I have with Stephen Harper’s (and the CPC’s) worldview? He doesn’t believe in ‘tikkun olam.’”


Irish filmmaker’s experimental doc turns him into a Zionist


Joanne Hill
CorrespondentTORONTO-MONTREAL – Irish filmmaker Nicky Larkin was peppered with critiques and questions following screenings of his documentary, Forty Shades of Grey, last week in Ottawa, Montreal and Toronto.

Larkin, who said he “came out as a Zionist” earlier this year, engaged with audiences after showings of his experimental film, which were co-sponsored by the Free Thinking Film Society, and B’nai Brith Canada and in Montreal also Chabad of the Town.


About Us


The Tribuneprovides its readers with timely news of concern to the grassroots Jewish community in Canada, Israel and around the globe. And while we carry our share of features, book/film/theatre reviews, arts/culture and sports articles, we focus on news reports from our correspondents and news services to ensure our readers get the real story – and the story behind the story – from a Jewish perspective.From the political issues of the Middle East to the hate crimes and antisemitic incidents in Canada and the rest of the world, the Jewish Tribune has you covered.


This week’s paper


Download a PDF of this week’s Tribune.

Visit the Archivesof the Jewish Tribune.

Subscribe to the Jewish Tribune.

15 Hove Street, Toronto, Ontario  M3H 4Y8


B’nai Brith responds

Saturday, June 16th, 2012

Jewish community applauds Toronto City Council’s condemnation of fallacious term “Israeli Apartheid”

Sunday, June 10th, 2012

B’nai Brith Canada News Release


TORONTO, 7 June 2012 – B’nai Brith Canada has commended Toronto City Council members on the passage of a motion condemning the use of the fallacious term “Israeli Apartheid” at Toronto’s Pride parade. The term has been used by Queers Against Israeli Apartheid, an anti-Israel protest group that plans to participate in this summer’s parade, in reference to the State of Israel. B’nai Brith is anticipating Toronto City Council’s upcoming anti-discrimination policy debate where it hopes the policy will be revised to prevent the use of the term “Israeli Apartheid” at taxpayer-funded events.

Upon passage of the motion at today’s Toronto City Council session, Frank Dimant, CEO of B’nai Brith Canada issued the following statement:
“Queers Against Israeli Apartheid’s participation in Pride Toronto not only defies logic, berating the sole Middle East country that fully welcomes the LGBT community, but also runs counter to the original philosophy of the parade itself, a celebration of diversity and acceptance. The passage of this motion condemning the use of the term “Israeli Apartheid” at Pride has signaled to Toronto, and indeed the entire country, that hate and intolerance are not welcome at Canada’s largest Pride festival. This is an important step as the City of Toronto joins numerous other Canadian government voices in recognizing that the “Israeli Apartheid” label is fallacious and divisive.”


Madonna launches tour with a bang

Sunday, June 10th, 2012

Madonna launches tour with a bang, tells crowd they can’t admire her and not want peace.

30,000 Israelis converge on Ramat Gan stadium to hear pop-diva live

This week Jewish Tribune

Wednesday, June 6th, 2012

Jewish Tribune issue 2012-06-07


American Thinker: “Jews, Jewish Leftists, and the Anti-Semitic Left”

Tuesday, June 5th, 2012

May 20, 2012
Jews, Jewish Leftists, and the Anti-Semitic Left

By Rick Richman
Last week, the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research held an extraordinary conference in New York, with 18 scholars presenting formal papers on “Jews and the Left,” addressing such issues as “present-day understandings of Jewish attraction to the Left in the 19th and 20th centuries,” whether today’s left is “in whole or in part anti-Semitic,” and the relationship between the left and Israel.

The response to these issues — coming from a group of scholars who were largely leftists or liberals themselves — was quite remarkable.

In his “Introductory Remarks,” Prof. Jack Jacobs of CUNY asserted that “the one-time ties between Jews and the left can best be explained by political, economic, and sociological conditions which existed in the 19th century, and which went out of existence in the twentieth” — that Jewish leftism was thus a creation of a time and place that no longer exists, not an enduring reflection of either Jewish religion or Jewish traits.

The uncertain relationship between Jewish leftism and Jewish religion was the theme of Michael Walzer’s keynote address, “The Strangeness of Jewish Leftism.” He listed the various ways in which Jewish leftism and Judaism are inconsistent and noted that Jewish leftism was a historical rejection of both Jewish tradition and traditional Jews. He quoted what he called the “profoundly accurate” observation by Polish poet Czes?aw Mi?osz about many Jewish leftist intellectuals of the 1920s and 1930s:

From general ideas about the equality of men, they drew the conclusion that the past does not count. They were unwilling to take an interest in Yiddish literature or translations into Polish, because they saw it as provincial and inferior, left over from the ghetto, the very mention of which was a tactless blunder. If anyone mentioned the Jews in their presence, they took offense, at once reading racism into the remarks. They tried at all costs to forget who they were.

But one result of forgetting “who they were,” in order to become immediate universalists, was an inability to transmit that culture over generations, in the way traditional Jewish culture reproduces itself each year with its particular rituals and readings. Prof. Walzer called for a re-engagement by Jewish leftists with Jewish tradition, acknowledging the remarkable political achievement of Jewish politics in exile, sustaining a national existence for 2,000 years without sovereignty or territory. He seemed effectively to be proposing a sort of particular Jewish leftism, one he hoped that, unlike the Jewish leftism of the past, “might be strong enough to pass on to our grandchildren.”

But the problem is not only that Jewish leftists left the Jews, but that leftism itself has left them as well. Ron Radosh of the Hudson Institute and PJ Media made a fascinating presentation, entitled “When the American Jewish Left Loved Israel,” reviewing the critical support given to the re-creation of Israel by the Soviet Union, the Nation, and I.F. Stone — whom Radosh called second only to Leon Uris in creating a wave of support for a beleaguered people trying to return to their homeland while opposed by the “true colonial power” of the time (Britain). He closed by noting that such leftist support for Israel is long gone.

These days, the Nation is the source of vitriolic opposition to Israel, and a significant part of the left is not only anti-Israel, but anti-Semitic. Prof. Mitchell Cohen of CUNY, who co-edited Dissent for nearly two decades, said he has gotten indigestion from “what parts of the Left have swallowed without getting indigestion.” He said the left “has a Zionist problem,” and part of it has a Jewish problem as well, and he repeated British novelist Iain Pears’ observation that anti-Semitism is like alcoholism: “You can go for 25 years without a drink, but if things go bad and you find yourself with a vodka in your hand, you can’t get rid of it.”

University of Manchester Professor Emeritus Norman Geras presented a stunning paper, entitled “Alibi Anti-Semitism,” describing the anti-Semitic climate that now affects what he called a “substantial section” of the left, which uses Israel as its “convenient alibi” for views that cannot be regarded as merely critical of particular Israeli policies. His conclusion, which he described as painful for a leftist such as himself — but as “necessary” in light of what his paper described — was this:

It is a moral scandal that some few decades after the unmeasurable catastrophe that overtook the Jewish people in Europe, these anti-Semitic themes and ruses are once again respectable; respectable not just down there with the thugs but pervasively also within polite society, and within the perimeters of a self-flattering liberal and left opinion. It is a bleak lesson to all but those unwilling to see.

University of Chicago Professor Moishe Postone, another leftist scholar, offered “Thoughts on History, the Holocaust, and the Left,” extending some themes he has described elsewhere — that the Jews “have once again become the singular object of European indignation,” with some forms of fascistic Arab nationalism “coded as singularly progressive” in order to provide a form of anti-Semitism “that was ‘legitimate’ for the Left, and was called anti-Zionism.”

Was Jewish radicalism a break with Jewish tradition or a movement inspired by Jewish history? In a historical look at “Jews and Communism in the Soviet Union and Poland,” Brandeis Professor Antony Polonsky juxtaposed two remarks — one by the great Jewish historian Simon Dubnov, and the other from Vassili Grossman’s novel Forever Flowing. In a 1917 speech, Dubnov observed that:

[M]any demagogues came from among us, who joined the heroes of the street and the prophets of power grabbing. They use Russian pseudonyms because they are ashamed of their Jewish origin (Trotsky, Zinoview etc.), but maybe it is their Jewish name which is not genuine, because they have no roots to bind themselves to our people.

Grossman wrote about the “powerful flame of fanaticism” that captured one of his characters — a “sad, sly shopkeeper from the shetl” who had no reason to hate capitalism based on his own circumstances and who caught the flame, perhaps, from the “wisdom” of the Communist Manifesto, or the suffering of “the impoverished people right beside him” — or perhaps something else that extended further back:

Or was it that the smoldering coals were buried deep within his thousand-year inheritance, ready to burst into flame — to do battle with Caesar’s Roman soldiers, to confront the bonfires of the Spanish inquisition, to join in the starving frenzy of the Talmudists, to emerge in the shetl organization for self-defense during the pogroms? Was it the age-old chain of abuses, the anguish of the Babylonian captivity, the humiliations of the ghetto, or the misery of the Pale of Settlement that had produced and forged that unquenchable thirst that was scorching the soul of the Bolshevik Lev Mekler?

Prof. Polonsky ended his paper with a touching reference to the Polish-Jewish poet Stanislaw Wygodzki, who emigrated to Israel in 1968 and whose 1990 interview in a Polish paper was entitled “I Served an Evil Cause.” The poet said he nevertheless still believed in the ideals of “something that was once called Communism” — which he characterized as the rejection of “exploitation, oppression and subjugation.”

For one who heard the two days of presentations at YIVO, however, what was most striking was not the old ideals of the utopian left, or Michael Walzer’s eloquent call for a leftist engagement with Jewish tradition in the future, but the ugly picture of “actually existing” leftism now. Prof. Geras ended his paper with this:

We now know, as well, that should a new calamity ever befall the Jewish people, there will be, again, not only the direct architects and executants but also those who collaborate, who collude, who look away and find the words to go with doing so. Some of these, dismayingly, shamefully, will be of the left.

Rick Richman’s articles have appeared in American Thinker, COMMENTARY, The Jewish Press, the New York Sun, PJ Media, and elsewhere.
Page Printed from: at June 05, 2012 – 09:53:35 AM CDT

Hizb ut-Tahrir and Caliphate Conference in Chicago

Monday, June 4th, 2012

On May 30th, the following was posted on “Jihad Watch”:

Hizb ut-Tahrir is an international Islamic organization that openly calls for restoration of the caliphate — that is, the political union of Muslims worldwide in a single Sharia state ruled by the caliph. This means that the group is dedicated to subverting and destroying all governments not ruled by Islamic law, and as such it is banned in many countries. But not in the U.S., which has never shown any awareness on an official level of non-violent efforts to impose Sharia. They’re once again coming to the Chicago area to hold their Caliphate Conference: it will be held on June 17 in Rolling Meadows, Illinois.

Year Closing Dinner

Monday, June 4th, 2012


This Year Closing Dinner will take place on June 12, 2012 at the JCC Calgary.

Tickets are $30.  Please RSVP by phone 403.255.6554  or email: